|
|
| Author |
Message |
angeltel Friend of the forum
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Location: united kingdom
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:02 am Post subject: sex.com / sex.com |
|
|
agreed with kevs (sex.com) is not great and thats from past expereinces and debates i have read on it.
adowrds is good if you use it correctly and coverts very well for me usually 1 in 45 ratio for good keywords and low cpc
on adwords if you put
-free so thats -free
your ad will not show for any1 typing in the word free its called a negative keyword
using a programme like wordtracker is good to play with to find keywords other than the already saturated ones, the 1 thing a lot of people forget is spelling mistakes, there is hundreds of keywords typed into google with spelling mistakes and this is where you can get a lower ppc and still stay on page1
i have read up on alot of programmes on adwords and can always get on page1 for low ppc,takes alot of tweaking and playing with and anylising but worth it as i convert well.
there is actually a programme out called adwords anaylsier and i know a few people have tested this and said the results are very very good. if i can find the url to it i wll post it.
angela |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martina Old hand
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Location: Germany, Hamburg
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:15 am Post subject: / sex.com |
|
|
Hey Angela,
I made the same experiences with adwords. With the software, did you mean this one? http://www.adword-analyzer.com/
With other pay per click advertising my experiences are ...sex.com isn`t successful, espotting the same. overture is much better (not as good as adwords, but on rank2), qualigo is also okay (rank3).
best regards,
Martina |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Adult Webcam FAQ Forum Index
-> Webmaster Chat -> sex.com |
All times are GMT + 8 Hours
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
The messages about sex.com on this page were written by the authors above as indicated and do not express
the opinion of this web site.
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|