Just chat... that's it?

[Hony]

Thanks for defining clearly your position -- but I think the point here is that it is your position, and might be different from mine or somebody else's.

And then there is the law -- which again varies, this time by country or even by 'community' if countries have laws with a "community standards" clause.

So where to draw the line is really an random exercises, and whether you are guided by ones personal standards, by the law or by something else no two people are going to end up with the same.

Hony

[Cams2Chat]

[Hony]

[Cams2Chat]

[Hony]

I have yet to see a site tell hosts they can't go nude. However I have seen studios where they specifically train the girls how to do non-nude-tease as a money maker.

They talk about being "better class" and getting the clients to "respect" the hosts more by not asking for nudity.

If men are willing to pay for that then why should I object? Some men will pay to be beaten by a lady in leather.

Hony

[kitty]

didn't notice that in fact many sites have a non adult category. The original post was about JUST CHAT. ImLive has the Friends and Romance category, iFriends has Friends and Fun, Dating, Internatonal Chat, CamContacts has Making new Friends and other I don't remember the name. I also heard that LiveJasmin has one now, too.
I already performed on non adult for those 3 sites and they do not allow you to do anything else but CHAT. Ifriends can suspended you if you only stand up for the member. Imlive declines a lot of pics you take because they say it seems sensual... So, when he said about a contract that forbid nude or that the host can't go too far, I thought about these situations.

[louchey]

If I may come back in here to clarify, although it's opened up some interesting issues, my original post concerned the site offer and customer expectations.

I had deliberately avoided citing sites and model names in favour of exploring the principles at stake and clearly it's a question that throws up many others.

My experience was that a model was declining to show - on an adult site - because she had, alledgedly, a contract with an advertising agency in another country (non adult) which might be jeopardised if anyone saw her.

Now, my thoughts were:-
1. If this were the case, she shouldn't really be working on an adult site.
2, The studio, if they knew this would be seated uncomfortably on the horns of a dilemma, but perhaps not so uncomfortably if they thought she would bring in revenue.
3. The site probably didn't know anything and wouldn't unless someone complained.
4. Perhaps she's just shy and making up a story which she'll go along with until she gets booted. "Well, it was good money while it lasted...all that teasing seemed to work"
5. I know, I'll post a question on Hony's site to see what others think

My view now is that someone, a model, who does this is really doing no one any favours. The customer probably feels cheated, thereby reflecting badly on the site whom ultimately she is representing. The warning Caveat Emptor is as relevant here as anywhere in the whole wide world.

Oh well, another day... another... choose your currency of choice

[shemale6]